TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a Peterborough applicant is comparing two U.S. offers with different duties, while a household business discussion has not settled whether to acquire control or a minority stake. The first useful step is to keep the proposals separate. Each option should be assessed on its own facts before the preferred commercial choice is treated as an immigration strategy.
TN, L-1A, L-1B, E-2, EB-5 and Gold Card answer different kinds of proposals. Compare professional work, qualifying company transfers, treaty investment and immigrant pathways using the actual citizenship, roles, company relationships and commitments. A shared goal of living or working in the United States does not make the requirements interchangeable.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Two similar titles can describe materially different work.

Build an option sheet with one column for each real proposal. Record the employer or business, duties, ownership, funding and unresolved conditions. Leave unknown facts visibly unresolved. Do not combine the best credential fit from one job with the more attractive duties of another, or assume one investment’s terms apply to a different business.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
Give each offer, transfer or investment proposal its own factual description.
Compare duties, control, funding and family implications instead of labels or headline prices.
Use the requirements relevant to the actual arrangement and identify missing facts.
Resolve the question most likely to change the decision before treating an option as settled.
You can request a consultation while choices remain open. Explain which option you prefer and why, then identify the immigration questions that could change the decision. An assessment may reveal an evidence gap, an arrangement that needs clarification or a substantive mismatch that cannot be solved by more persuasive wording.
Find your pathwayFor a Peterborough request, provide the current proposals and a short list of decisions rather than an assumed final route. Confirm consultation arrangements and review scope. Commercial preferences, family plans and immigration requirements can be considered together while keeping clear which facts belong to each option.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
You can bring several concrete proposals. Keep their facts separate and identify the decision you need to make.
The review must concern the actual work being proposed. Do not combine incompatible facts into a description that neither employer is offering.
No. Ownership, control, qualifying funds, the enterprise and the applicant’s role need assessment independently of price.
This draft is for the City of Peterborough. Proposed township coverage is recorded separately; Kawartha Lakes and Northumberland are outside that saved scope.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.