No. The actual applicants and applicable immigration requirements need review as well as the financial obligations.
Define the proposal first
Identify intended inclusion and unresolved individual questions. Capacity to pay does not guarantee approval or visa availability. Hypothetical example: a rare-book digitization entrepreneur considering an individual application after selling a business.
At a first review, the first review should identify the applicant, the intended official option, permanent-residence eligibility, admissibility, and whether a visa is available. The records most likely to settle that point are identity and civil records, official application materials, source-of-payment evidence, and records relevant to the required immigration eligibility. Sequence the work deliberately: confirm the appropriate official path before paying or making a move commitment, then follow the instructions for that applicant.
A common error is treating the ability to make a large payment as if it independently creates an immigrant classification; that error matters because a conclusion based on incomplete or mismatched facts may not carry to the final arrangement. Write down the decision that remains after the review, the fact that could change it, and the record needed to resolve that fact. This creates a usable file rather than a collection of documents that cannot be connected to the actual plan.