Read the general investor planning overview
Hypothetical example: a Cavan Monaghan grain-drying and storage contractor buys a U.S. agricultural services business, paying partly in cash, partly through financing, and contributing owned equipment to the enterprise. Each of those three components is proved differently, and the file has to establish the value, the ownership and the commitment of each.
Cash is proved by a path, not a balance
Funds qualify when they are irrevocably committed to the enterprise and genuinely at risk of partial or total loss. Establishing that requires an unbroken trail: how the money was lawfully generated, every account it passed through, and the payment into the enterprise or into an escrow whose terms make the commitment real. A bank balance alone establishes capacity rather than commitment. Amounts already spent on the business are usually the easiest to characterise, because the expenditure has occurred and cannot be recalled, and the invoices and payment records prove themselves.
Equipment contributed in kind needs value and title
Assets transferred into the enterprise can form part of the investment, but they raise two questions that cash does not. The first is ownership: title or purchase documents showing that the equipment belonged to the investor and has actually been conveyed to the enterprise. The second is value, which should rest on an independent basis — an appraisal, comparable market evidence, or documented purchase cost with depreciation — rather than on the owner's estimate. Any equipment subject to security or a lease is not unencumbered, and the encumbrance has to be disclosed and accounted for in the valuation.
Financing is judged on what secures it
Borrowed funds are not excluded, but the security decides how they are treated. Where the investor borrows against personal assets and is personally liable, the funds can generally count as the investor's own capital at risk, because the investor bears the loss if the enterprise fails. Where the loan is secured by the assets of the enterprise itself, it does not count as the investor's qualifying investment. The loan agreement and its security provisions are therefore central documents, and the financing structure should be settled with this distinction in view rather than arranged for convenience and explained afterwards.
What else is on your mind?
Is there one minimum investment that guarantees E-2 eligibility?Is holding money or owning an asset enough for E-2?Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.